

Written by Jack Jemsek
Sunday, 21 February 2010 11:03
Now that the Celtics have weathered the chant of “Trade Ray Allen”, we have been rewarded with some vintage Celtics in key road victories against the Lakers and Trailblazers. All the Celtics have to do now is survive the repeated visuals that ESPN and TNT show regarding how the Big Three of Garnett, Pierce and Allen are all having their worst years statistically since their rookie outings. Top that off with the mantra that the Celtics are just plain too old and dinged-up to be serious contenders. As Marc Spears of Yahoo recently wrote, these “aging and limping” version of the Celtics are losing a lot of the faithful with each passing week. Perhaps Mike Bibby was right about the bandwagon fan base for our Celtics? But clearly, there is no one amongst us who doesn’t have a little voice in the back of their head asking “Can the Celtics still do this?”
The conventional wisdom is that the Celtics 23-5 start which was capped by the Christmas Day win over the Magic in Orlando is simply an aberration. After all, the same thing happened last year – a great start to the season and a mediocre finish with Garnett out and Pierce and Allen out of gas. Perhaps they just caught lightning in a bottle in Year 1 of the Big Three and that’s all folks. The frailty of the Celtics can be veiled no longer.
What emboldens the “old and frail” references is the fact that the Celtics have coughed up significant leads in at least 10 losses since that magical Christmas game. By losing these leads, it’s as if the games were each a microcosm of a season that was going to fall well short of the infamous prediction of 72+ wins and a championship this year. It is as if the season and these 2nd half collapses are mimicking the “circle of life”. So we approach a fork in the road for this team . . .
--------read more after the jump--------